(1.) THIS petition is filed against the order dt. 24.1.94 whereby the Court of Second Additional Sessions Judge, Durg in Criminal Revision No. 227/90, dismissed the revision petition against the order dt. 25.5.90 and 26.5.90 of J.M.F.C, Durg in Criminal Case No. 1514/89 pending before him. The Magistrate has passed an order purporting to be under section 319 CrPC that application of the accused Narottam Lal (who is respondent No. 2 before this Court) directing that Kamla Bai, the present petitioner (who was cited as a witness in Criminal Case before the Magistrate) be summoned as a co -accused. The facts of the crime were as under - -
(2.) WHEN evidence was being recorded, the accused Narottam (who is respondent No. 2 here) filed an application u/s 319 CrPC and on concession by the A.P.P., that was accepted by the Magistrate and Kamla Bai, the present petitioner, was summoned as a co -accused.
(3.) THE confirming order of the Additional Sessions Judge and the order of the Magistrate deserves to be set aside straight away. These orders are set aside and the petition u/s 319 CrPC is dismissed. Kamlabai cannot be arrayed as an accused to be tried in this case.