NANNU LAL Vs. RAM PYARI BAI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner by Mr. K.K.Lahoti, Advocate. Respondents by Mr. R.A. Roman, Advocate. Heard. In pursuance of a money decree there was auction sale of the property described as under :

(2.) This property was auctioned on 20th of November, 1976. A sale certificate was issued in terms of Order 21. Rule 94. This sale certificate was issued on 13th of September, 1977. Later on. when possession was sought to be taken an objection was taken that the sale certificate is being sought to be executed visa-vis property description whereof were as under :

(3.) There is no dispute that in the auction notice, description given were as indicated in para 1 above. Possession is sought to be taken of the property which is described in para 2 above. The learned counsel for the respondent purchaser submits that the certificate could be amended. According to him, the judgment debtor has only one house. He was aware of what is being sold and therefore, he cannot raise any objection.