(1.) THE respondent a handicapped person -sought benefit of Chapter IIII -A of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). His status as a handicapped person and that he does fall within the term landlord as defined in section 23 -J of the Act is not in dispute. As a matter of fact, no serious argument with regard to physical handicapped condition of the landlord has been raised.
(2.) THE Rent Controlling Authority (hereinafter referred to as Authority) came to the following conclusions:
(3.) BEFORE noticing the various contentions raised by the learned counsel for the parties, it would be apt to note some of the pleadings.