(1.) As common questions of law and facts are involved in these three writ petitions, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
(2.) In WP No.7699/2015 the petitioner calls in question action of the respondents in finalizing the e -auction undertaken for grant of sand quarry lease in Budhani -02 [SMC0053). In WP No.11199/2015 challenge is made to grant of quarry lease in Budhani -03 [SM0054], and in WP No.16119/2015 challenge is made to grant of sand quarry lease in Nasrullaganj -I District Sehore.
(3.) As far as Budhani -02 sand quarry and Chandiya [SMC0089] sand quarry are concerned, challenge to these are also made in WP No.7699/2015, it is a case of the petitioner that reserved price for these sand quarries was fixed at Rs.2,25,00,000/ - and for participating in the E -auctioning process a prospective bidder had to deposit 10% of the auction price i.e. reserved price. Accordingly, the petitioner is said to have deposited the reserved price for Budhani -02 mines amounting to Rs.22,50,000/ -. Similarly, for Chandiya [SMC0089] upset/reserved price was fixed at Rs.60,33,000/ - and the petitioner is said to have been deposited the reserved price of Rs.6,07,300/ -. According to the petitioner, the bid started from Rs.99,23,000/ - and was increased by Rs.50,000/ - on every time by the prospective bidder and ultimately the bid came to Rs.3,26,23,000/ -. At this stage, the petitioner is said to have offered a further increase of Rs.50,000/ - through the online system of bidding, but due to error in the online/computer system, it is said that increase of Rs.50,000/ - took the bid to Rs.30,31,23,000/ - and at this amount bid of the petitioner for Chandiya mines was fixed. According to the petitioner, they offered an increase of Rs.50,000/ - to the final bid amount of Rs.3,26,23,000/ -, and the amount of bid should have been Rs.3,31,23,000/ -, but due to some error in the online computer system, the bid amount was incorrectly reflected as Rs.30,31,23,000/ -.