REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

BARE LAL Appellant

V/S

DEEPA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SUDHIR BHASKAR RAO TAMBE VS. HEMANT YASHWANT DHAGE AND ORS [REFERRED TO]
THANSINGH NATHMAL ONKARMAL JAWALAPRASAD INDRACHAND PREMSUCH RAMDEO SATYANARAYAN INDRACHAND PREMSUCH SHEWPRATAP TANTIA VS. SUPERINTENDENT OF TAXES DHUBRIIN ALL APPEALS :SUPERINTENDENT OF TAXES DHUBRIIN ALL APPEALS :SUPERINTENDENT OF TAXES DHUBRIIN ALL APPEALS :SUPERINTENDENT OF TAXES DHUBRIIN [REFERRED TO]
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES EMPLOYEES UNION REGD VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION VS. REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS MUMBAI [REFERRED TO]
GANGADHAR JANARDAN MHATRE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH KUMARI VS. STATE N C T OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
HARI SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
LALLAN CHAUDHARY VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
ALEQUE PADAMSEE VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SAKIRI VASU VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
NIVEDITA SHARMA VS. CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSN OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
LALITA KUMARI VS. GOVT. OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) All the aforesaid writ appeals involve common questions of law and therefore have been heard analogously and are decided by this common order.

(2.) The core issue raised herein is whether a writ of mandamus can be issued under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the police to register an offence under Section 154(1) Cr.P.C. in a petition raising grievance that despite informing the police about the commission of cognizable offence, no FIR is lodged.

(3.) Now this Court takes up the principal issue No.1.

Click here to view full judgment.

BARE LAL Vs. DEEPA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address