LAWS(MPH)-2006-11-4

AMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF M P

Decided On November 20, 2006
AMAR SINGH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ARGUMENTS heard. Case diary perused.

(2.) CASE diary has not been sent by the concerned Excise Officer, bhagwanpura to learned Public Prosecutor, in spite of repeated request being made in this regard by learned Public Prosecutor to concerning officer, for last two occasions.

(3.) BOTH parties heard.