LAWS(MPH)-2006-5-146

SEEMA MISHRA Vs. STATE OF M.P.

Decided On May 11, 2006
SEEMA MISHRA Appellant
V/S
STATE OF M.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD .

(2.) WITH the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being disposed of in the following manner:

(3.) SHRI V.P. Nema, learned Government Advocate, supported the impugned orders. However, in the absence of return, learned Dy. Government Advocate is not in a position to refute the factual averments made in the writ petition.