(1.) Heard counsel for the parties on admission.
(2.) It is not in dispute that the agreement as executed by the petitioner is for the remainder auction period upto 31-3-2015. The petitioner, however, whilst executing the agreement registered protest and executed the agreement without prejudice on the assertion that the petitioner was entitled for minimum 2 years of tenure and not the remainder tenure upto 31-3-2015. The Authorities have not acceded to that request. As a result, the petitioner has approached this Court for direction against the Collector to allow the petitioner to avail of full tenure of 2 years of sand mining and therefore to extend lease agreement till 1-2-2017.
(3.) According to the petitioner, as per the mandate of Rule 7, the lease agreement for grant of trade quarry cannot be for less than 2 years' tenure from the date of taking over possession. For that the petitioner is relying on Rule 7 of the M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 (for brevity "Rules of 1996") and drawing analogy from Rule 22 of the Rules of 1996. Rule 7 of the Rules of 1996 reads thus:--