MANOJ YADAV Vs. MAYA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE applicant has preferred the present revision against the order dated 26.5.2006 passed by the Third Additional Sessions Judge, Khandwa in criminal revision No. 185/2005, whereby the order dated 29.7.2005 passed by JMFC, Khandwa in criminal case No. 33/2003 was reversed and a maintenance of Rs.700/ - per month was granted to the respondent.

(2.) ADMITTED facts of the case are that the marriage of the respondent and the applicant took place on 8.2.2001 at Khandwa. On 29.11.2001, the couple was blessed with a male child.

(3.) THE applicant in his reply has denied about the allegations made by the respondent. He has pleaded that father of the respondent was an old person, who had a flour mill but, due to his old age, he could not run that flour mill. One brother of respondent was residing at Betul in his in -laws' house, whereas one brother of the respondent was earning his income by plying an auto -rickshaw The respondent and her parents have pressurized the applicant to reside with them and to run the flour mill. It was pleaded that the respondent was residing in her parents house on her own wish. Therefore, she was not entitled to get any maintenance.