DEEPESH KUMAR DUBEY Vs. STATE OF M.P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner, a Contractual Worker, was appointed by order dated 25.10.2014 (Annexure P -6). The petitioner's appointment was cancelled by order dated 29.12.2014. This order is called in question mainly on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice. It is contended that the impugned order is an adverse order and, therefore, before passing such order the petitioner should have been given opportunity of hearing.

(2.) THE return is filed by contending that the documents of the petitioner were lateron verified. On verification it is found that there are infirmities and irregularities in the declaration and, therefore, his appointment is cancelled. By placing reliance on Manual of 2014, it is submitted that such manual gives power of termination in this manner. Shri Bansal relied on Clause 2.9 of the said manual.

(3.) I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.