REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

PREMCHAND JAIN Appellant

V/S

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

TAYLOR V. TAYLOR [REFERRED TO]
MUNGONI V. ATTORNEY- GENERAL OF NORTHERN RHODESIA [REFERRED TO]
KING-EMPEROR V. SIBNATH BANERJI [REFERRED TO]
GULLAPALLI NAGESWARA RAO V. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION [REFERRED TO]
RAMNATH VERMA V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
NAZIR AHMED V. KING EMPEROR [REFERRED TO]
DATTATRAYA MORESHWAR VS. STATE OF BOMBAY [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BOMBAY VS. PURUSHOTTAM JOG NAIK [REFERRED TO]
P JOSEPH JOHN VS. STATE OF TRAVANCORE COCHIN [REFERRED TO]
GHAIO MAL AND SONS VS. STATE OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
H C NARAYANAPPA D R KARIGOWDA VS. STATE OF MYSORE [REFERRED TO]
SAMARTH TRANSPORT CO PRIVATE LIMITED VS. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY NAGPUR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BIHAR VS. RANI SONABATI KUMARI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. BABU RAM UPADHYA [REFERRED TO]
MALIK RAM MALIK RAM VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
NEHRU MOTOR TRANSPORT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND OFTEN VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. SRIPAL JAIN [REFERRED TO]
SOUTH INDIA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED VS. SECRETARY BOARD OF REVENUE TRIVANDRUM [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SINGHARA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
R CHITRALEKHA VENKATESUBBA REDDY VS. STATE OF MYSORE [REFERRED TO]
C RAJAGOPALACHARI VS. CORPORATION OF MADRAS [REFERRED TO]
SHAMBHU NATH GHOSH VS. BEJOY LAKSHMI COTTON MILLS LTD [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRA BHAN VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is directed against:

(2.) OTHER existing operators have claimed similar reliefs in regard to Scheme No. 2 in Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 155, 277 and 278 of 1964. For like reliefs, similar Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 149, 150. 151, 152, 153, 154, 156, 280 and 281 of 1964 in regard to Scheme No. 4, nos. 52 and 112 of 1964 in regard to Scheme No. 5, Nos. 157, 160 and 214 of 1964 in regard to Scheme No. 7 and Nos. 124, 133, 213, 219 and 275 of 1964 in regard to Scheme No. 9 have also been made by the existing operators affected by those Schemes. This order shall dispose of all these petitions also.

(3.) AS already indicated, these petitions call in question the various steps taken under the machinery provisions contained in Chapter IVA of the Act and the rules made thereunder for approving certain schemes providing for the Slate Transport undertaking to carry on the passenger transport business on certain routes to the complete or partial exclusion of all other persons, including the existing operators. Scheme No. 2 relating to certain routes round about Gwalior, as originally prepared, was published in the State Gazette dated 1st March 1963 in accordance with the requirements of Section 68c of the Act. Scheme No. 4 relating to certain routes round about Morena and Bhind, Scheme No. 5 relating to certain routes starting from Chhindwara, Scheme No. 7 relating mainly to the Sagar-Kareli-Piparia route and Scheme no. 9 relating to certain routes round about Sagar and damoh were similarly published on 7th June 1963, 30th August 1963 and 13 november 1963 respectively.

Click here to view full judgment.

PREMCHAND JAIN Vs. STATE OF M P

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address