HARDAYAL BALMIKI Vs. RAMPRASAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD .

(2.) THIS appeal by plaintiff under Section 100 of C.P.C. is directed against the concurring judgment and decree dated 10/03/2014 passed by District Judge, Sheopur, in Civil Appeal No. 24 -A/2013; confirming the judgment and decree dated 4/9/2013 passed by Second Civil Judge, Class II, Sheopur in Civil Suit No. 61 -A/2013. By the impugned judgment and decree the plaintiff's suit for declaration and permanent injunction has been dismissed.

(3.) DEFENDANTS No. 1 to 3 filed joint written statement whereas remaining defendants have filed written statements separately denying the plaint allegations inter alia contending that suit land has never been either in possession of ancestors of plaintiff or plaintiff. Plaintiff has no connection with the suit land. As such defendants prayed for dismissal of the suit.