(1.) This is first application on behalf of the applicants under Sec. 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail.
(2.) Learned counsel for the applicants submits that as alleged applicant No.1 is a guarantor in the present case. He submits that as per the allegation, the applicant No. 2 raised a loan from Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Service Ltd. and got a tractor financed. He submits that thereafter the applicants prepared forged documents such as NOC and that the tractor is not under hypothecation and on the basis of the said forged documents they obtained a loan from Shri Ram Finance Company Limited also showing that the said tractor is free from finance/loan and other liabilities and as such they have committed a fraud with both the companies. Counsel submits that applicants have already cleared all the loan of Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Service Ltd. and also of Shri Ram Finance Company Ltd. and therefore now keeping the present applicants in jail is of no use. He submits that other co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Upon such submission, counsel prays that applicants may also be granted bail.
(3.) Learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the bail application and submitted that looking to the conduct of the applicants, they are not entitled to be released on bail.