REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

SUNIL SEHGAL Appellant

V/S

CHHAYA SEHGAL Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

RUSSET V. RUSSEL [REFERRED TO]
M.K.MALHOTRA V. KIRTI MALHOTRA [REFERRED TO]
PRAMILA BHATIA V. VIJAY KUMAR BHATIA [REFERRED TO]
D.MANGA @ MANGAMMA V. D. VENKATA RAMANA [REFERRED TO]
SWARNA KAKKAR V. GULSHAN KAKKAR [REFERRED TO]
SHYAMABAI V. SONA SINGH LODHI [REFERRED TO]
V.BHAGAT V. D.BHAGAT [REFERRED TO]
UMRI BAI V. CHETAN [REFERRED TO]
N G DASTANE VS. S DASTANE [REFERRED TO]
JORDEN DIENGDEH VS. S S CHOPRA [REFERRED TO]
SHOBHA RANI VS. MADHUKAR REDDI [REFERRED TO]
CHANDERKALA TRIVEDI VS. S P TRIVEDI [REFERRED TO]
ROMESH CHANDER VS. SAVITRI [REFERRED TO]
S HANUMANTHA RAO VS. S RAMANI [REFERRED TO]
SAVITRI PANDEY VS. PREM CHANDRA PANDEY [REFERRED TO]
PRANEEN MEHTA VS. INDERJIT MEHTA [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KUMAR VS. VIJAY LAKSHMI [REFERRED TO]
RAJAN VASANT REVANKAR VS. SHOBHA RAJAN REVANKAR [REFERRED TO]
MOHINDER KAUR VS. BHAG RAM [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is husband's appeal against dismissal of his petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (Act for short ). Ground taken had been that of cruelty under Section 13 (1) (B) of the Act which the Trial Court did not find proved.

(2.) PARTIES were married on 13. 12. 1984. Appellant-husband is employed in the Bank of India. Respondent-wife is employed in the Punjab National Bank. They have a male issue named Ankit born on 10. 6. 1988. He has been living with the respondent throughout.

(3.) TO prove that living together has become impossible for the appellant has alleged following specific instances:

Click here to view full judgment.

SUNIL SEHGAL Vs. CHHAYA SEHGAL

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address