SATISH JATAV Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner seeking following reliefs:-

(2.) It is apparent from the record that one Vishun Lal Jatav has lodged an FIR against the present petitioner with regard to harassment to respondent No. 5 who is daughter of Vishun Lal Jatav and on the basis of the complaint, offences under Ss. 457, 352 and 336 of IPC were registered vide Crime No. 138/2021. Now, it is the allegations of the petitioner that on the similar complaints of Vishun Lal Jatav, he has been harassed by the Police Authorities and is being called by them under the pretext of investigation and he is also detained at the Police Station. In such circumstances, he has made several representations to the Police Authorities, but no action has been taken so far.

(3.) Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents.