LALTA PRASAD Vs. RAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the interlocutory order dated 25.04.2012 passed by the Civil Judge Class 1, Kurwai, District Vidisha whereby an application under Section 45 of Evidence Act preferred by the defendant No.1/petitioner herein praying for conduction of medical examination of the plaintiff for ascertaining his exact age, has been rejected on the ground that the said factum of exact age of plaintiff/respondent herein is matter of evidence and also that similar request of the defendant has been rejected by the trial Court on 27.01.2012. this Court in it's limited supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has to assess as to whether while passing the impugned order the trial Court has transgressed any it's jurisdiction limits or not.

(2.) While passing the impugned order, the trial Court has assigned dual reason of the factum of age being a matter of evidence and similar request of the defendant have been rejected earlier, for declining the prayer of the defendant No.1 for medical examination of the plaintiff to ascertain the exact age.

(3.) THE said two reasons assigned by the trial Court can very well be accepted as reasonable in the attending facts and circumstances of the case.