(1.) This order shall lead to final disposal of writ petition Nos.
(2.) Issue which crops up for consideration is whether respondent Railways are justified in declining to entertain the claim put forth by the petitioner in respect of the over charge which accrued because of the goods booked for transportation to destination station were taken through shorter route than the route through which it were booked, which led to claim for the difference.
(3.) To be specific, the facts on record as are not disputed by either of the parties, are carved out from writ petition No. 466/2009 for the purpose of proper appreciation of the issue.