LAWS(MPH)-2002-9-45

ANIL KUMAR GROVER Vs. UNION OF INDIA

Decided On September 19, 2002
ANIL KUMAR GROVER Appellant
V/S
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the action of the respondents in not issuing the tender documents as per Orders (P-5), dated 11-5-2002 and (P-6), 26-4-2002. Petitioner preferred appeals that have also been disallowed as per order (P-9), dated 14-6-2002 and (P-16), dated 16-8-2002 passed by respondent No. 2.

(2.) PETITIONER submits that petitioner is a reputed engineer and a recognized contractor in the field of construction. He is registered with the Public Works Department of Govt. of M. P. as a contractor of A-5 class which is of super special class (hereinafter referred to as "ss") that is the one which is of unlimited monetary limit. Petitioner submits that he has successfully executed a number of big works and is, therefore, equated with construction legends like M/s. Larson and Tubro Ltd. , M/s. Ircon International Ltd. and M/s. Simco Birla Ltd. , etc.

(3.) IN the month of January, 2002, the respondent No. 3 Chief Engineer, Head Quarters, Jabalpur Zone, invited applications from eligible contractors enlisted with MES, PWD, CPWD, etc. for issue of tender forms in respect of two different works viz. , (i) Replacement/new Construction of Magazines (Phase II) at Ordnance Factory, Khamaria and (ii) Provision of 144 OR's OTM ACCN for 1 STC at Jabalpur. Notices are Annexures P-1, P/1-A and P-2. Petitioner being an eligible and registered contractor with PWD, submitted his application to respondent No. 3 for issue of tender form in respect of both the aforesaid works alongwith various documents viz. , the registration certificate, income tax clearance certificate, bankers solvency certificate, etc. After submitting the applications (P-3) and (P-4), petitioner was hopeful of issue of tender forms to him. However, the same have been denied to the petitioner without assigning any reason as per orders (P-5) and (P-6 ). Remedy of appeal was available to the petitioner. Petitioner preferred appeals; petitioner detailed his financial position, income tax clearance certificate, bankers solvency certificate, etc. However, the appeal for work of Replacement/new Construction of EDK Magazines (Phase II), O. E. , Khamaria has been dismissed as per order (P-9) passed by respondent No. 2/chief Engineer, Head Quarters, Central Command, Lucknow.