VINOD KUMAR PANDEY Vs. COLLECTOR, SHAHDOL AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE writ petitions are filed against the order passed by the Collector, District Shahdol. The Collector quashed the selection list of Shiksha Karmis Grade III prepared by the Janpad Panchayat, Budhar. The order passed by the Collector was challenged before the Commissioner in revision. The Commissioner, Rewa Division, Rewa partially modified the order passed by the Collector on 9 -3 -1999 with respect to Shakuntala Singh and Vandana Singh. This order of Commissioner is also challenged in W.P. No. 6821/2000 and W.P. No. 6698/2000.

(2.) AN advertisement was issued on 6 -6 -1998. Separate applications were invited for the posts of Shiksha Karmis 221 posts falling under the Education Department, 41 posts of Tribal Welfare Department were advertised. 2 posts of Science Teacher in Tribal Welfare Department were advertised and 58 posts for Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission were advertised. It was clearly stated in the advertisement that the applicants had to submit separate applications for the concerned posts of each and every department. Separate fee was required to be paid. Petitioners submit that some of them applied for 3 departments, whereas some of them applied for post of one or two departments only. Separate interviews were conducted department -wise on different dates. Three separate/different departments conducted interviews on three different dates. Advertisement P/4 also provided for bifurcation and reservation department -wise.

(3.) THE Petitioners in W.P. No. 6821/2000 submit that initially after the interview three different selection lists were prepared and published by Education Department, Tribal Department and Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission. The appointment orders were issued separately by each of the department. Different Petitioners were appointed in their respective departments.