LAWS(MPH)-2021-7-32

PRADEEP KUMAR GUPTA Vs. WEST CENTRAL RAILWAY

Decided On July 15, 2021
PRADEEP KUMAR GUPTA Appellant
V/S
West Central Railway Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the Letter of Acceptance, dated 19-02-2021 in favour of the respondent No.3, M/s Rail Transport Corporation of India, for contract of leasing of 23 round Trip VP HBJ-HNZM-HBJ Train 12155/56 (0215502156) HBJ-H-NZM-HBJ Bhopal Express for five years.

(2.) The facts of the case, in a nutshell, are that in response to the tender notice dated 14-12-2020 three bids were received, i.e. (i) H1- Harsh Transport Pvt. Ltd.; (ii) H2 - Pradeep Kumar Gupta (the present petitioner); and (iii) H3 - Rail Transport Corporation of India (respondent No.3). It is submitted that H1 has been rejected, since it had not furnished audited balance sheet for the Financial Year 2019- 20 and the bid of the petitioner was rejected since he was debarred by Muradabad and Sambalpur Division. In view of the aforesaid, a Letter of Acceptance (Annexure-P/1) was given to the respondent No.3, which was H3.

(3.) It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that he has been awarded two contracts vide Annexure P-8 and Annexure-P/9 from West Central Railway, Bhopal Division and from Delhi Division of Northern Railway respectively. These acceptance letters are dated 23-01-2020 (Annexure-P/8) and 01-06-2020 (Annexure-P/9) respectively. The same have been given to the petitioner after the date when the orders dated 19-6-2019 and 04-7-2017 were received from Sambalpur and Muradabad Division respectively, debarring the petitioner for a period of two years. The next plank of submission of the petitioner is that when in spite of these orders, Annexure-P/7 debarring the petitioner from participating in tender for two years, he has been permitted by the Bhopal Division of West Central Railway and Delhi Division awarding contract leasing of 4 tonnes of R/SLR and 3.9 tonnes in another train, vide Annexure-P/9, then there is no reason why he could not be considered for being allotted the the instant contract also.