(1.) HAVING perused the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal impugned in this appeal filed by the assessee under Section 260a of the Income-tax Act, 1961, we find no question of law much less substantial question of law in the appeal as is required to be made out being the sine qua non for invoking the jurisdiction conferred under Section 260a ibid and hence we have no option but to dismiss the appeal in limine.
(2.) WHAT is involved in this appeal is essentially a question based on facts. The issue was whether deletion of Rs. 1,34,422 made by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) by relying on Section 40a (3) of the Act is proper or not. It was found by the Tribunal that in this very case, i. e. , for the year 1979-80, the matter came up to the Tribunal wherein the Tribunal gave direction to the Assessing Officer to find out and verify the details of the transaction relating to deletion of Rs. 1,34,422 by obtaining confirmatory letters from the person concerned. In other words, the Assessing Officer was asked to examine the genuineness of the transactions in relation to Rs. 1,34,422. This was not done and hence it was held to be the income of the assessee.
(3.) IT is this addition which is impugned by the assessee. In the opinion of the Tribunal since the assessee failed to comply with the directions issued by the Tribunal in the earlier round of litigation by not filing any documents to prove the genuineness of the transactions it has to held to be the income in the hands of the assessee.