LAWS(MPH)-1990-9-12

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Vs. LAXMAN SINGH

Decided On September 10, 1990
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. Appellant
V/S
LAXMAN SINGH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SHORT contention of Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant, is that on the date of accident, the insured Bijendrasingh, who is insured in the records of insurance company and the policy was issued in his name, covering risk of the vehicle No. CPH 5167, transferred the vehicle to one Ajit Kumar. As this was a suppression of the material fact, the policy lapsed from the date of transfer. The name of Ajit Kumar is also recorded in the records of Regional Transport Authority. Therefore, the Tribunal, without holding an enquiry, committed an illegality in passing order under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (for short 'the Act' ).

(2.) MR. R. D. Jain, learned counsel for respondent No. 4, contended that this is not the appropriate stage where the defence under Section 96 (2) of the Act can be considered while deciding an application under Section 92-A of the Act. All the defences under Section 96 (2) of the Act will have to be tried and then decided after recording the evidence.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the claimant contended that as the vehicle was insured with the insurance company which fact has also been admitted in the written statement in para 8, therefore, prima facie, the insurance company, the driver and owner are liable to pay the amount of Rs. 15,000/which has been awarded as an interim award on no fault liability basis. Learned counsel, Mr. Goyal, placed reliance on two decisions of Gauhati and Delhi High Courts reported in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal 1988 ACJ 612 (Gauhati) and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. N. P. Tyagi 1989 ACJ 599 (Delhi ). Learned counsel also placed reliance on the decision of this court in Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bandhan 1988 (II) MPWN 104, wherein this court had taken the view that the purpose of Section 92-A is to award interim maintenance without delay and the relationship between the insurer and insured cannot be decided before grant of interim award.