MANGIBAI Vs. SURESH S O KISHAN PATEL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Shri V.K. Jain for the petitioners.

(2.) Notice has been sent to Insurance Company. This is a Revision petitioner and the point involved is disbursement of the compensation amount which has been awarded to the claimants of deceased victim. Mangibai happens to be the widow of deceased Keshuram. Claimant Hemaji is the father of deceased Keshuram and claimant Smt. Bardibai is his mother. The M.A.C.T. Manasa directed that the amount of Rs. 30,570/- be given to Mangibai but out of that Rs. 10570/- should be given to her in cash and remaining amount of Rs. 20,000/- be deposited in Fixed Deposit of six years term. The M.A.C.T. directed that the amount of compensation awarded to the minors be deposited in Fixed Deposit in their names for protecting their interest. An application was moved by Mangibai for getting the said amount released to her for maintaining the minor children. The M.A.C.T. Manasa, dismissed that application and, therefore, the petitioners have approached this Court, more particularly Managibai, Hemaji and Bardibai.

(3.) Shri V.K. Jain, counsel appearing for them submitted that Mangibai has to bring up the minor children, four in number in these hard days of escalating prices and she is not able to do it by utilising the sum of Rs. 10,570/-. He submitted that keeping in view the ages of parents of deceased Keshuram they be given the amount for the purpose of utilising it for their old age. He pointed out that Rs. 10,000/- have been given to both of them in cash. The directions given by the Supreme Court in Susamma Thomas's case (AIR 1994 SC 1631) are to be applied to the cases coming before the M.A.C.T. keeping in view facts of each case. There cannot, be a hard and fast rule applicable to all the cases. Some claimants may be needy and some may not be needy. Some claimants may be having their urgent needs and if the amount which has been awarded to them as compensation is not released for using it at the time of difficult situation, there would be nothing else but hard-ship to such hapless claimants. The M.A.C.T. has to act with a broader approach and has to inform itself about the realities of the life and difficulties of the poor villagers and poor persons. Stitch in times saves nine has to be kept in mind. One in the nest is always better than two in bushes is to be understood properly. If such amount is not released for meeting urgent needs of such hapless claimants they would be thrown to village and even a city shylocks. After getting into the net of these shylocks, every day and night would be a nightmare constantly to them and that would be nothing but dooming them for ever by adopting an unreasonable attitude.