(1.) THE learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that respondent No. 3 is not a necessary party and, therefore, he may be permitted to be deleted. He has further submitted that even while hearing the writ petition, no notice was issued to respondent no. 3 before the petition was rejected.
(2.) PERMISSION for deletion of respondent no. 3 is granted Respondent No. 3 stands deleted.
(3.) ADMIT. At the request of the learned advocates, the appeal is finally heard today.