LAWS(APH)-2009-7-36

LAGADAPATI DHANALAKSHMI Vs. LAGADAPATI ANJANEYULU

Decided On July 24, 2009
LAGADAPATI DHANALAKSHMI Appellant
V/S
LAGADAPATI ANJANEYULU Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Second appeal is directed against the judgment dated 29. 09. 2006 passed by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge at Ongole in A. S. No. 1 of 2002.

(2.) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants i. e. , as they were arrayed in the original suit filed before the trial Court.

(3.) THE brief facts leading to filing of the present appeal may be stated as follows: the plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of agreement dated 11. 07. 1987 against the first defendant, pending suit the first defendant died and defendants 2 to 4 are brought on record as legal representatives. According to the plaintiff, the first defendant agreed to sell the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff for an amount of Rs. 30,000/- and executed an agreement to sell on 11. 07. 1999 in favour of the plaintiff and received the sale consideration of Rs. 29,000/- from the plaintiff. As per the stipulation mentioned in the agreement, the plaintiff has to pay the balance of sale consideration of Rs. 1,000/- by 15. 09. 1997 and obtain registered sale deed from the first defendant. However, though the plaintiff expressed the readiness and willingness to perform his part of contract, the first defendant postponed the execution of sale deed on one pretext or other and thereafter the plaintiff got issued a registered lawyer's notice on 08. 09. 1997 to the first defendant calling upon him to receive the balance of sale consideration and to execute the registered sale deed in his favour. Having received the said notice, the first defendant sent a reply on 17. 09. 1997 contending inter alia that the alleged agreement to sell is forged document, that on account of the disputes between him and the plaintiff, the plaintiff brought into existence the said agreement to sell. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 11. 07. 1997 and for possession of the plaint schedule property.