LAWS(APH)-1998-3-48

SAINT JOSEPH EDUCATION SOCIETY Vs. KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY

Decided On March 11, 1998
SAINT JOSEPH EDUCATION SOCIETY, ANANTAPUR Appellant
V/S
KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal is directed against the order of rejection of the writ application by the learned Single Judge. On the factual score, it depicts that the cancellation of a University examination centre has prompted the writ petitioner to move this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The learned Single Judge in a very detailed and elaborate judgment came to the conclusion that there cannot be any such legal right to be enforced. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we do find some substance in such observation of the learned Single Judge. The University has a choice or option in the matter of selecting the places for examination. In the event, the University selects one against other place for examination, the question of there being a writ petition challenging the action of the University does not and cannot arise.

(2.) On the factual score, it, however, appears that there were certain allegations of malpractice as regards the particular examination centre belonging to the petitioner and the University came to the conclusion on that it may not be proper for it to conduct the examinations there. The user of the discretion of the University ought not to be, in our view, interfered with by the Court of law, as otherwise the Court of law would be supervising the examinations conducted by the University, which is neither warranted nor proper, under any circumstances, The University has authority to determine the places of the examinations and it is no part of the Court's duty to interfere with such function of the University. The decision relied upon by the Advocate in support of the appeal in State of Orissa vs. Binapani Dei in our view, does not bear any application in the contextual facts.

(3.) In that view of the matter, we are unable to record our concurrence to the submissions of the appellant that a valid right has been eroded warranting intervention of the writ Court. The appeal therefore fails and is dismissed. No order as to costs.