(1.) The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition challenging the refusal of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, to quash an order of suspension, but issuing a direction to the respondents to review the suspension and to transfer her to a different place.
(2.) Heard Dr. P.B. Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.Lakshman, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India for the respondents 1 to 4.
(3.) The petitioner was placed under suspension on 21-01-2009. Three charge memos were issued against her. One charge memo was quashed by the Tribunal and one charge memo has now ended in a minor penalty. Another charge memo ended in censure.