(1.) The petitioner is ah association of the employees of the A.P. Dairy Deve-lopment Co-operative Federation Limited ('the Federation', for short). The petitioner-association consists of Indian Dairy Diploma-holders and it is constituted for protecting the welfare and service interest of the Diploma-holders. Respondent No. 1 is the Federation which is the employer. Respondents 2 to 5 are impleaded as parties. They are also employees of the Federation, but they are Degree- holders who will be affected if the peti-tioner's contention is accepted.
(2.) The petitioner-association seeks a declaration that the fixing up of ratio of 1:3 between the Diploma-holders and Graduates for promotion as Grade I officer, is illegal, null and void and is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner seeks a consequential direction to the first respondent to promote the Degree-holders as Gr. -I Officers from Gr. II without following the basis of ratio of promotions as between the Diploma-holders and the Degree- holders. The Federation and respondents 2 to 5 maintain that the ratio of promotion between the Diploma-holders and the Degree-holders is justifiably founded and contend that there is no case for interference by this Court.
(3.) I heard Sri K. Nageswarao, learned Counsel for the petitioner-association, Sri C. Ramakrishna Government Pleader for the first respondent and Sri. V. Venkataramanaiah, learned Counsel for respondents 2 to 5. I also perused the counters filed by respondent No. 1 and respondent 2 to 5.