(1.) The petitioners are the School Assistants of C.B.M, High School, Samalkot. It is stated that the first respondent, the Government of Andhra Pradesh took a policy decision to admit certain schools to grant-in-aid, pursuant to which the above said School was admitted to grant-in-aid by orders issued in G.O. Ms. No.321 Education Department, dt.24-7-1986 with effect from 1985. The grievance of the petitioners is that no grant-in-aid was released from 1-3-1986 to 31-3-1987 and therefore they sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to release the funds in respect of the petitioners claim of the salaries for the period from 1-3-1986 to 30-6-1987.
(2.) In the counter-affidavit filed by the Assistant Secretary to the Government, the material facts are not disputed. However, in the additional counter-affidavit filed by the Deputy Secretary to the Government on 21-10-1995, it is submitted that the Legislature of the State of Andhra Pradesh passed the Andhra Pradesh Private Educational Institutions Grant-in-Aid (Regulation) Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') which was given retrospective effect from 22-7-1985. The validity of that Act was upheld by a Division Bench of this CourtbyaJudgment inW.A.No.1961/88 and batch-dated 19-11-1988. Pursuant to Section 3 of the said Act, the committee recommended the case of the said C.B.M. High School along with other schools and the school was admitted to grant-in-aid with effect from 1-11-1989 by orders issued in G.O.Ms. No.326 dated 17-10-1989. It is further submitted that by virtue of Section 2 of the said Act no educational institution which was admitted to grant-in-aid pursuant to the orders in G.O.Ms. No.326 dated 17-10-1989 shall be entitled to arrears of grant-in-aid for the period from 1-9-1985 to31-10-1989 and it isadded that with effect from 1-11-1989 the School is being admitted to grant-in-aid.
(3.) Mrs. Jayashree Sarathy, the learned Counsel for the petitioners has vehemently contended that once the School was admitted to grant-in-aid by the Government that right cannot be taken away; that order still stands and has not been cancelled by any subsequent GovernmentOrder;therefore, the petitioners are entitled to the salaries for the period from 1-3-1986 to 30-6-1987.