(1.) There is no representation on behalf of the respondent. Therefore, the learned Advocate for the petitioner has been heard and the matter is being disposed of on merits.
(2.) The petitioner seeks review of the judgment of this Court in C.R.PNo.786 of 1993 dated 1-7-1994 reported in Srikanth Spinners represented by its Proprietor K. Rajesham Kalakal vs. State Bank of India, Toopran Branch, Gajwel Taluk.
(3.) The grounds on which the review is sought are:-