LAWS(APH)-2015-4-14

SUKESHINI KALOHE Vs. STATE OF TELANGANA

Decided On April 02, 2015
Sukeshini Kalohe Appellant
V/S
State of Telangana Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALL these 3 cases raise a common question of law and hence they are dealt with together. The opposite parties, in particular the contesting respondent is the same in all the three cases.

(2.) THE petitioner in W.P.No.646 of 2015 was employed as an Assistant Consultant with the 3rd respondent company, which is considered a Gaint amongst Indian Information Technology and Information Technology enabled service providers. The petitioner in this case joined the 3rd respondent company on 25.04.2012.

(3.) THE petitioner in W.P.No.950 of 2015 was also employed as an Assistant Consultant from April, 2011 by the 3rd respondent.