COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. JANAPRIYA ENGINEERS SYNDICATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) MR . S. Ravi, learned senior advocate, appears in response to the pre -admission notice on behalf of the assessee. We have heard Mr. B. Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel for the appellant.

(2.) WE admit the appeal for statistical purpose on the following substantial question of law.

(3.) WE are of the view that until and unless the decision of the Special Bench is upset by this Court, it binds smaller Bench and coordinate Bench of the Tribunal. Under the circumstances, it is not open to the Tribunal, as rightly contended by Mr. Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel, to remand on the ground of pendency on the same http://www.itatonline.org issue before this Court, overlooking and overruling, by necessary implication, the decision of the Special Bench. We simply say that it is not permissible under quasi judicial discipline. Under the circumstances, we set aside the impugned judgment and order, and restore the matter to the file of the Tribunal which will decide the issue in accordance with law and it would be open to the Tribunal either to follow the Special Bench decision or not to follow. If the Special Bench decision is not followed, obviously remedy lies elsewhere.