LAWS(APH)-1993-3-78

STATE BANK OF INDIA REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER Vs. UNIION OF INDIA REP BY GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RLYS

Decided On March 22, 1993
State Bank Of India Rep By Its Branch Manager Appellant
V/S
Uniion Of India Rep By General Manager, Northern Rlys Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Aggrieved by the order dated 12-8-1991 passed in LA. No. 380 of 1991 in OS. No. 378 of 1991 on the file of the Additional Sub-Judge's Court. Guntur, the present revision petition is filed.

(2.) Petitioner is the plaintiff, who filed OS. No. 378 of 1991 for recovery of a sum of Rs. 45,13,044/- together with interest and costs from respondents- defendants 1 to 5. The Court below decreed the suit as against defendants 1 to 3 and 5 with interest and costs while dismissing the suit as against defendant No. 4 with costs. On the basis of the Judgment and decree., the learned counsel for 4th respondent-defendant filed a fee memo claiming Rs. 47,280/- Aggrieved by the said fee Memo I. A.No. 380/91 was filed by the petitioner-plaintiff under Sections 151 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking amendment of the decree in respect of costs of Rs. 47,280/- towards the claim filed by the counsel for the 4th respondent defendant. The ground urged by the petitioner-plaintiff before the Court below was that the petitioner-plaintiff claimed an amount of Rs. 9,25,000/- in the suit as against the 4th respondent defendant and, therefore, once the suit is dismissed against the 4th respondent-defendant with costs, as per the Advocates' Fee Rules, the entitlement of advocate's fee has to be restricted only to the extent of liability claimed by the petitioner-plaintiff and any claim over and above the liability against the 4th respondent defendant is illegal.

(3.) The Court below having examined this aspect held that the petitioner- plaintiff has not made out any reasons to grant the relief sought for, inasmuch as the suit claim is Rs. 45,13,044/- and the court-fee was paid on the said claim and there is no rationale in denying the costs to the counsel for the 4th respondent-defendant on the value of the entire suit claim when the petitioner- plaintiff has paid fee to their advocate on the value of the entire suit claim.