RAMAKRISHNA FOOD INDUSTRY Vs. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This Writ Petition is filed for a certiorari to quash order dated 5-11- 2012 in I.A.No.1/2012 in W.C.No.1/2012 on the file of respondent No.2. As the order proposed to be passed by this Court will not affect the interests of respondent No.3 in any manner, it is not necessary to serve notice on him. I have heard Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

(2.) Respondent No.3 is the employee of the petitioner. He has approached respondent No.2 by filing W.C.No.1/2012 claiming compensation for the injuries suffered by him. The petitioner resisted the said claim, inter alia pleading that respondent No.3 has suffered the injuries as he failed to follow its instructions. The petitioner filed I.A.No.1/2012 requesting respondent No.2 to frame the following issues:

(3.) Respondent No.2, by the impugned order, has disposed of the said I.A. by observing that the issues raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner will be looked into and answered in the final order.