(1.) THIS appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree dt.31-01-1992 in O.S.No.103 of 1975 of the Additional Sub-ordinate Judge, Anantapur.
(2.) BEFORE I deal with the appeal and ASMP.1630/2013, it is necessary to mention certain events which took place prior to and during the hearing of this appeal.
(3.) ON 29-07-2013, Sri C.Ramachandra Raju, learned counsel, appeared for 4th respondent and stated that he had entered appearance for 4th respondent in the appeal only on the said date and sought time to argue the appeal and the ASMP.1630/2013. Therefore, to accommodate him, the case was posted to 1.8.2013 to hear his arguments in the appeal and the A.S.M.P. Even on 29-07-2013, he did not state that he would argue only A.S.M.P and not the appeal.