REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

TUMMLA NAGESWARA RAO Appellant

V/S

NAGULURI KRISHNA KUMAR GOUD Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

G. LAKSHMINARAYANA V. POLICE INSPECTOR [REFERRED TO]
PRABHANSHU KAMAL AND OTHERS V. AWADHESH SINGH BHANDORIYA AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
P. SIRAJUDDIN V. STATE OF MADRAS [REFERRED TO]
M. NARAYANDAS V. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
R P KAPUR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL DAS SINDHI VS. STATE OF ASSAM [REFERRED TO]
NIRMALJIT SINGH HOON VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
A R ANTULAY VS. RAMDAS SRINIWAS NAYAK [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HARYANA VS. BHAJAN LAL [REFERRED TO]
VINEETNARAIN VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. RAJ SINGH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. ARUN KUMAR AGARWAL [REFERRED TO]
K KARUNAKARAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
SURESH CHAND JAIN VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. M DEVENDRAPPA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. PRAKASH P HINDUJA [REFERRED TO]
R SAI BHARATHI VS. J JAYALALITHA [REFERRED TO]
SATISH KUMAR GOEL VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
SHANTI DEVI VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
ME DOWELL AND CO LTD VS. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MADHU BALA V. SURESH KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
P RAGHUTHAMAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Since common questions of fact and law arise in these two petitions, they are being disposed of by a common order.

(2.) 1st respondent, who is common in both the petitions, filed a complaint before the Principal Special Judge for Special Police Establishment (SPE) and Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) Cases, Hyderabad against the petitioners and fifteen others, with a prayer to direct an investigation into offences under Section 13(1) (d) (ii) and (iii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') and Sections 120-B and 409 IPC against them.

(3.) The allegations, in brief, therein are Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Limited (APBCL), which has monopoly over wholesale trade of liquor in Andhra Pradesh as per Section 4 of Andhra Pradesh (Regulation of Wholesale Trade and Distribution and Retail Trade in Indian Liquor, Foreign Liquor, Wine and Beer) Act, 1993, procures various types of liquor and beer directly from the local distilleries on a rate contract basis and supplies the same to the retailers for a profit. To ensure supply of liquor and beer at a reasonable price to consumers, APBCL in its tender document for the excise years 1997-98 to 1999-2000 laid down a condition as clause 2.7, which reads:

Click here to view full judgment.

TUMMLA NAGESWARA RAO Vs. NAGULURI KRISHNA KUMAR GOUD

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address