LAWS(APH)-2022-10-163

NAGIPOGU SUDHAKAR Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Decided On October 17, 2022
Nagipogu Sudhakar Appellant
V/S
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri G.Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri N.Ranga Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2/ Badvel Municipality, represented by its Commissioner and Sri S.Lakshminarayana Reddy, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent Nos. 5 to 7.

(2.) The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:

(3.) Sri G. Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's mother Smt. N.Obulamma purchased the land to an extent of Ac.2.89 cents in Sy.No.1755-1 situated at Chennampalli Village Fields of Badvel Town, YSR Kadapa District (in short subject land) from her vendor namely Nadipogu Veeraiah vide Registered sale deed document No.1985/1982, dtd. 25/3/1982. The name of the petitioner's mother was also mutated in the revenue records, such as 1-B (ROR), Namuna and No.3 Adangal/Pahani and the revenue authorities also issued Pattadar Pass Book. After her demise, the petitioner, with other legal heirs is in enjoyment of the subject land. He further submits that the respondent Nos. 5 to 7 without any right or title started raising illegal construction in the subject land forcibly as the 5th respondent was elected the Vice Chairperson of the 2nd respondent/Badvel Municipality, without obtaining any building plan against which the petitioner made a complaint to the 3rd respondent/District Collector, YSR Kadapa District, and the Municipal authorities but, no action was taken. The petitioner then approached this Court in W.P.No.14715 of 2021, which was disposed of by order dtd. 29/10/2021 recording the submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the Municipality "that the respondent-Municipal Authorities, only after holding enquiry as to the title and right over the subject property, will proceed further for grant of building permission", but, inspite thereof, the 5th respondent being the Vice Chairperson of the Municipality, the official respondents did not take any action. He further submits that the petitioner has filed O.S.No.38 of 2022 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Badvel against the respondents 2 to 4, 6 and 7 for a decree of declaration of right and title over the subject land as also for permanent injunction, which is pending.