LAWS(APH)-2012-10-15

ATHAPURAM RAGHURAMAIAH Vs. DYAVA RAMAIAH

Decided On October 04, 2012
ATHAPURAM RAGHURAMAIAH Appellant
V/S
DYAVA RAMAIAH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 02.03.2010 in O.S.No.43 of 2008 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Vemulavada, Karimnagar District, wherein it has been held that Exs.B-1 to B-3 documents marked through D.W.1 were deficiently stamped and accordingly directed the concerned party to take steps for impounding the documents either before the Court or before the concerned authorities.

(2.) The respondent herein filed suit O.S.No.43 of 2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Vemulavada, Karimnagar District, impleading the petitioners herein as defendants seeking a decree for perpetual injunction restraining them from entering into and interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property measuring Ac.0.04 1/2 gts of land in Sy.No.43/A situated at Kurikyala Village, Gangadhar Mandal, Karimnagar District. According to the plaint averments, the respondent-plaintiff is the absolute owner and is in exclusive possession of the said property. His name is also reflected in the revenue records, including the Pattadar Pass Book. The petitioners-defendants are strangers to the said land and they have no right or interest whatsoever over the said property. The respondent-plaintiff's possession was sought to be disturbed by the petitioners-defendants because he refused to sell the land to them.

(3.) It appears that the 1st petitioner-defendant No.1 has not chosen to file written statement. The 2nd petitioner-defendant No.2 filed written statement, inter alia, stating that the respondent-plaintiff entered into an agreement of sale of the suit land with the 1st petitioner-defendant No.1, who is her husband, and on payment of the total sale consideration, possession of the suit schedule property was delivered to the 1st petitioner-defendant No.1. Thereupon he constructed a house after obtaining necessary permission from the Gram Panchayat and thus the petitioners-defendants acquired the right over the suit schedule property and are in enjoyment of the same.