BAVIRISETTI NAGAMANI Vs. GUTHIKONDA RAMA PRAKASH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The claimants are the appellants. They assail the award of the learned Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, West Godavari District at Eluru (for short "the Tribunal"), whereunder their claim was dismissed on the ground that the offending vehicle was not covered by policy at the time of accident. Contending that the offending vehicle was insured at the time of accident, the claimants preferred the present appeal. The 1st respondent was the driver of the offending lorry bearing Registration No. AP-16-T-559. The 2nd respondent was the owner of the offending vehicle. The 3rd respondent was the insurer thereof. The deceased Bavirisetti Satyanarayana was the cleaner of the offending lorry when the accident occurred. The deceased met with his death in the said accident. His parents and unmarried sister claimed compensation at Rs. 2,00,000/-. The Tribunal arrived at a sum of Rs. 1,95,220/- together with interest at 9% per annum as just and reasonable compensation. However, considering that Ex.B1 policy did not cover the period of accident, the claim was dismissed.

(2.) Sri N. Nageshwararao, learned Counsel for the claimants submits that the civil miscellaneous petition in MACMA MP No. 5331 of 2012 under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC may be received as the claimants proposed to file copy of earlier policy to Ex.B1 as additional document.

(3.) I am satisfied with the grounds on which additional document is sought to be marked. Consequently, MACMA MP No. 5331 of 2012 is allowed. Copy of the policy now produced is marked as Ex.A7.