LAWS(APH)-2002-3-34

B R NARESH KUMAR Vs. REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE

Decided On March 11, 2002
B.R.NARESH KUMAR Appellant
V/S
REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner obtained Passport from the respondent in the year 1995. He contends that though his date of birth is 16-9-1975 in the Passport it is recorded as 16-9-1972. When he tried to approach the respondent with an application for correction of date of birth the respondent refused to receive the same. Hence, he filed this writ petition for appropriate directions. W. P. No. 4453 of 2002 :

(2.) In this writ petition, the petitioner obtained Indian Passport from the Office of the respondent. According to the petitioner though his date of birth is 15-1-1947 in the Passport the date of birth is recorded as 15-1-1939. Therefore, he made an application to the respondent on 18-2-2002 with a request to make necessary corrections in the passport. The respondent refused to receive the application and therefore, the petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not changing the date of birth of petitioner in the Passport as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to change his date of birth as 15-1 -1947 duly deleting the recorded date of birth as 15-1-1939. As both the writ petitions raise same question, they are being disposed of by this common order.

(3.) The subject of issue of Passports and Travel Documents is regulated by a Parliamentary Enactment called Passports Act, 1967 (for short 'the Act'). Section 5 of the Act requires an application to be made by a person for issue of Passport under the Act for visiting any foreign country or countries. When an application is made under sub- Section (2) of Section 5, the Passport Officer/ Passport Authority is required to make an enquiry and subject to the provisions of the Act issue an order directing the issue of Passport or Travel document. If a Passport is refused under Clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 5. the Passport Authority is required to give reasons as per sub-section (3) of Section 5. Section 6 contemplates various grounds for refusing Passport or Travel Document. Refusal of Passport gives right to appeal under Section 11 to any higher authority to which the Passport Authority subordinate. The Act nowhere empowers the Passport Authority to correct a Passport or Travel Document issued under either Clause (a) or Clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 5. It is well settled that a statutory authority is bound to act within the scope of power vested in it and such authority cannot transgress and usurp the power, which does not inhere in it.