VEENA CHALLA Vs. A. PANDU RANGA REDDY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O. S. No. 684 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the I - Addl. District Judge, R. R. District at L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad. The suit is filed for partition of the suit schedule properties and to allot _¼th share to the plaintiff.

(2.) AFTER service of suit summons, the defendants 2 and 3 filed the written statement denying the plea of the plaintiff that the suit schedule property is the joint family property. The joint possession and enjoyment claimed by the plaintiff has also been specifically denied contending that the defendants are in possession and enjoyment in their individual capacity as evidenced by the revenue records and in fact some of the lands were already sold to third parties.

(3.) I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record.