LAWS(APH)-2001-9-100

GOPAL L Vs. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MEDAK

Decided On September 05, 2001
L.GOPAL Appellant
V/S
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MEDAK DISTRICT Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) To put the grievance of the petitioner, in nut shell, is that though he was selected to the post of Attender/Process Server, as reflected in the communications sent to him by the District Judge, Medak District at Sangaredy, dated 18-6-2000 and 3-7-2000, he was not appointed to the said post and the said inaction of the learned District Judge is irregular and illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. So alleging, the petitioner has sought for mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the learned District Judge, Medak in giving appointment to the petitioner as Attender / Process Server with effect from 10-7-2000 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and for a consequential direction to the learned District Judge to appoint the petitioner as Attender/Process Server with effect from 10-7-2000 the date on which he was directed to report for duty in pursuance of the appointment order dated 18-6-2000 with original certificates.

(2.) Opposing the writ petition, a detailed counter-affidavit is filed by the 1st respondent-District Judge, Medak.

(3.) At the time of hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents placed before us the original records relating to the selection and appointment of the candidate to the post of Attender/ Process Server earmarked for the Scheduled Tribe Category. The records placed before us disclose that the District Judge, Medak issued Notification, dated 20-12-1999 calling for the applications to fillup one post of Process Server/ Attender under Scheduled Tribe (men) Category. In response to that Notification, the petitioner as well as one Sri C. Gopal and some others applied for the said post from that category. The learned District Judge after going through the selection procedure, prescribed under the Recruitment Rules, prepared a panel of three Scheduled Tribe candidates for the post of Process Server/ Attender. That panel includes names of (i) Sri C. Gopal, who got secured 62 marks, (ii) Sri Devidas who got secured 50 marks, and (iii) Sri M. Mansingh, who got secrued 48 marks. The said panel was forwarded to the High Court on administration side for approval in terms of the recruitment regulations. The High Court on consideration of the recommendations made by the learned District Judge and having regard to the relative merit of the three candidates included in the panel, ultimately approved the appointment of one Sri C. Gopal to the post of Process Server/Attender and this approval was communicated to the learned District Judge, Medak, vide proceedings of the High Court in ROC No. 449/99-RC, dated 23-06-2000.