(1.) The appellant had preferred an appeal as against the judgment and decree made in OS No. 149 of 1985 dated 18-8-1986 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Narsaraopet, insofar as it relates to the non-awarding of the contractual rate of interest.
(2.) The main contention of the appellant-bank is that the Court below should have granted interest @ 14.75% per annum with quarterly rests, as prayed for, and the Court below had erred in granting interest only @ 12 1/2% per annum with proportionate costs.
(3.) The appellant had instituted a suit for recovery of amount of the strength of a mortgage deed. The case of the appellant/ plaintiff, as averred in the plaint, is that the defendant Nos. 1 to 6 and one late Gnanaprakasam borrowed a sum of Rs. 9,000.00 from the appellant-plaintiff and had executed a demand promissory note on 19-10-1976 agreeing to repay the interest at 6% over the bank rate of interest with minimum of 15% of quarterly rests and they had also executed a letter and a mortgage deed and the third defendant and Gnanaprakasam, in fact, had acknowledged the liability on 7-8-1979, 4-7-1979, 22-2-1982, 12-7-1982 and thereafter Gnanaprakasam died leaving behind defendant Nos. 4 to 6 as legal representatives in the suit. Since, inspite of repeated demands, the amount was not repaid, the suit was instituted.