LAWS(APH)-1990-11-3

K VASAVI RAO Vs. CHAIRMAN SELECTION COMMITTEE FIRST YEAR MBBS COURSE PRINCIPAL GANDHI MEDICAL COLLEGE BASHEERBAGH HYDERABAD

Decided On November 29, 1990
K Vasavi Rao Appellant
V/S
Chairman Selection Committee First Year Mbbs Course Principal Gandhi Medical College Basheerbagh Hyderabad Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner appeared for the EMACET (Engineering, Medical and Agricultural Common Entrance Test) for the academic year 1990 heid in May, 1990. She obtained rank No. 11374. His father is a Commandant in the Border Security Force and he is now stationed in Assam. With 23 years of service in B.S.F., he proved himself to be an efficient and able officer; he was awarded Police Medal for conspicuous gallantry in 1971 during Indo-Pakistan War (Bangala Desh War). The petitioner belongs to a scheduled caste. Certain percentage of seats are reserved in favour of members of the scheduled castes besides other reserved categories including children of servicemen and ex-servicemen. The minimum percentage of marks in respect of candidates falling outside the ambit of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes is 30 per cent in the aggregate for qualifying in the entrance test. So far as candidates belonging to SCs and STs are concerned, Rule 5(9) says that:

(2.) The stand taken on behalf of the respondents-Registrar, A.P. University of Health Sciences and Convener, EMACET is that the petitioner's case was not considered under the quota reserved for children of servicemen and ex-servicemen as she did not secure the minimum qualifying marks 30 per cent in the aggregate. Among scheduled castes candidates she secured very low rank, far below the number of vacancies reserved for that category.

(3.) Shri Mahmood Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that when the petitioner was eligible to seek admission as a member of the scheduled caste, her claims could not be excluded for consideration under the other reserved category- children of servicemen and ex-servicemen. Amongst the candidates belonging to scheduled castes there cannot be a further classification into those : (a) who secured 30 or more per cept of marks and (b) who secured less than 30 per cent of marks. When the rules lay down that members of the scheduled castes who secured less than 30 per cent of marks in the aggregate also fall within the ambit of qualified candidates, the respondents have no power to exclude the claims of the petitioner for consideration under the quota relating to children of servicemen and ex servicemen.