S P ENTERPRISES Vs. UPBHOGTA SANRAKSHAN SAMITI, HARIDWAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY way of this revision petition, legality of the order dated 2.6.2006 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar in consumer complaint No. 232 of 2003, Upbhogta Sanrakshan Samiti v. M/s. S.P. Enterprises, Haridwar, has been challenged by the opposite party -revisionist.

(2.) BY the aforesaid order, the application of the complainant for leave to amend the complaint in order to substitute the relief clause by amended relief clause was allowed.

(3.) WE have heard the learned Counsel for the revisionist and perused the record. None appeared from the complainant's side despite a notice having been sent by registered post, which was not received back unserved even after expiry of period of one month. The order sheet of consumer complaint No. 232 of 2003 (Paper Nos. 28 -29) indicate that the complainant has had notice of the revision petition pending before the commission and in which an order was passed staying the proceedings of the consumer complaint. It is, thus, evident that the complainant refrained from putting in appearance to contest the revision petition.