DAIAMOND LANGRIN, LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF MASTER BANKITBOK LANGRIN AND MASTER KHRAWKUPAR LANGRIN Vs. THILINA L MARSHILLONG

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Mr. P. Nongbri, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. M.F. Qureshi, learned counsel for the respondent.

(2.) The brief fact of the appellant's case in a nutshell is that:

(3.) The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent obtained a succession certificate from the Judge, District Council Court, Shillong and since the Civil Court was on vacation, the appellant could not file a revocation petition and contest the succession application issued by the Judge, District Council Court, Shillong, so he may be allowed to file a petition for revocation and to contest the impugned succession order dated 14.12.2016 passed in S/C Misc. Case No. 321 of 2016.