(1.) There is nothing which survives of this appeal as the writ petitioner obtained complete benefit by the judgment and order impugned. As a matter of fact, the appellant cannot even be considered to be a person aggrieved by the judgment and order impugned dated November 20, 2019.
(2.) The writ petition carried two major prayers: the first pertained to a notice dated August 30, 2019 by which the writ petitioner was required to submit his thesis by October 15, 2019; and, the second was for an extension of time for the petitioner's thesis to be submitted.
(3.) The operative part of the order impugned provides, inter alia, as follows:-