LAWS(BOM)-2019-10-96

HEMANT D SHAH Vs. CHITTARANJAN D SHAH

Decided On October 15, 2019
Hemant D Shah Appellant
V/S
Chittaranjan D Shah Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioners have impugned the arbitral award dated 15th April,2016 rejecting the claims filed by the petitioners and directing the petitioners to pay cost of Rs.7,00,000/- to the respondents. Some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding this petition are as under :-

(2.) The petitioners were the original claimants whereas the respondents were the original respondents in the arbitral proceedings. On 2nd April, 1977 V.U.Shah Family Trust and N.U.F.Shah Family Trust and C.U.Shah Family Trust constituted a partnership firm in the name and style of M/s. Prospective Traders. On 9th December, 1985, the original partners thereafter took the petitioners and the respondents as partners of the said firm. Clause 11 of the said Deed of Partnership provided that upon retirement of any of the partners, the partnership shall not be dissolved but the same shall continue as regards the continuing partners. Clause 16 of the said Partnership Deed provides for arbitration.

(3.) It is the case of the petitioners that on 24th April,1998, the original partners served notice of retirement through their advocates giving three months notice of their intention to retire from the said firm. Upon retirement of the original partner, the petitioners and the respondents are the only partners of the said firm having equal share in the said firm pursuant to the said Deed of Partnership dated 9th December,1985. It is the case of the respondents that by a Partnershipcum-Retirement Agreement dated 30th December, 1987 and 3rd July, 1995, the original partners had retired on 30th December, 1987. The petitioners themselves had retired on 3rd July, 1995. The share of each partners under clause (7) of the said partnership were (a) petitioner no.1 HUF - 36%, (b) petitioner no.2 - 14%, (c) respondent no.1 HUF - 22%, (d) respondent no.2 - 28%. The petitioners have disputed their signatures on the Retirement Deed dated 30th December, 1987.