(1.) Challenge in this Appeal is to the judgment and order dated 14th July, 2006, delivered by learned 2nd Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial No.5/2006, convicting the appellants (hereinafter referred to as "the accused") for offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 306 r/ws. 34 of the IPC. For offence punishable u/S. 498-A, the accused were sentenced to suffer R.I. for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default, to suffer SI for 3 months; whereas for offence punishable u/S. 306, IPC, they were sentenced to suffer R.I. for five years and fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default, SI for three months. Both the sentences were directed to be run concurrently.
(2.) The prosecution version as unfolded during the trial, can be summarized as under :-
(3.) We have heard Ms.S.H.Bhatia, learned counsel (appointed) for the accused and Mr.M.J.Khan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State. With their able assistance, I have carefully gone through the entire record and proceedings of the case.