(1.) Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and is heard by consent.
(2.) In Regular Civil Suit No. 121/2004/II the present petitioners submitted application on 18.4.2008 with prayer which reads as follows:
(3.) The foundation of the said application is that the defendants wanted to produce and rely upon an opinion rendered by a private handwriting expert, dated 24.3.2008, relating to plaintiff's disputed signature. It was pleaded that if production of further evidence is allowed, it would not prejudice the plaintiff in any manner.